Propensity score matching stata pdf

An intuitive introduction to propensity score matching. How to extend the propensity score methods to multilevel data. Propensity score matching with clustered data in stata. Five subclasses are expected to remove 90% of bias from modeled covariates. Propensity score matching psm refers to the pairing of. The teffects psmatch command has one very important. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score. Propensity score matching psm has become a popular approach to estimate.

To model the steps involved in preparing for and carrying out propensity score analyses by providing stepbystep guidance and stata code applied to an empirical dataset. Implementing propensity score matching estimators with stata preparing the dataset keep only one observation per individual estimate the propensity score on the xs e. Over the past 25 years, evaluators of social programs have searched for nonexperimental methods that can substitute effectively for experimental ones. Jun 08, 2011 propensity score matching allows one to estimate the att imbens, 2004. Propensity score matching and related models examples in stata greedy matching and subsequent analysis of hazard rates optimal matching postfull matching analysis using the hodgeslehmann aligned rank test postpair matching analysis using regression of difference scores propensity score weighting. Jul 02, 2018 a pdf of the slides presented can be found here. Propensity score matching psm has become a popular approach to estimate causal treatment effects. We can estimate propensity score using logistic regression. Matching estimator and transformed outcome both unbiased in large sample when perfect matching can be found. Mar 28, 2015 propensity score matching is a common technique used to estimate the effects of a treatment or program when you dont have a randomized controlled experiment. Propensity score matching is a way to correct the estimation of treatment e. Propensity score matching in observational studies author. The trainers will present the theory behind the method, how it differs from other analyses of statistical control, and provide an illustration of propensity score matching.

This type of matching is known as propensity score matching psm. In the statistical analysis of observational data, propensity score matching psm is a statistical matching technique that attempts to estimate the effect of a treatment, policy, or other intervention by accounting for the covariates that predict receiving the treatment. They suffer systematic bias in cases where standard regression methods do. Propensity score matching methods, as we demonstrate, are especially useful under such circumstances because they provide a natural weighting scheme that yields unbiased estimates of the treatment impact. Outline 1 observational studies and propensity score 2 motivating example. For more information, see the section propensity score strati. Propensity score methods for multilevel data propensity score has been developed and applied in crosssectional settings single level data. Introduction methods such as nearest neighbor matching or propensity score techniques have become popular in the social sciences in recent years to preprocess data prior to the estimation of causal e ects in observational studies with binary treatments under the selection on observables. Recently, the spotlight has focused on one method, propensity score matching psm, as the. Practically, matching methods seem to work better than regression and weighting methods in some. For many years, the standard tool for propensity score matching in stata has been the psmatch2 command, written by edwin leuven and barbara sianesi.

The mnps function, which stands for multinomial propensity scores, estimates propensity score weights for studies involving more than two treatment or exposure groups. Is taking math lessons after school helpful in improving score. In contrast, the nearestneighbor matching estimator implemented in teffects nnmatch uses a bias. Propensity score matching psm refers to the pairing of treatment and control units with similar values on. There are three ways to use the propensity score to do this balancing. And now is a good time to look at the distribution of your propensity score. Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization. Treatment evaluation is the estimation of the average effect of a program or treatment on the outcome of interest.

In addition, we also investigate the impact of assigning different weights to the propensity score in the mahalanobis metric, namely 0. It is widely applied when evaluating labour market policies, but empirical examples can be found in very diverse fields of study. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the. Stata has a function for tseffects for obtaining propensity scores, and the function of psmatch for propensity score matching. Implementing propensity score matching estimators with stata. But transformed outcome introduces variance due to weighting factor. Quasiexperimentelle wirkungsevaluation mit propensity score. Briggs university of colorado may 20, 2009 abstract using observational data from the education longitudinal survey of 2002, the effect of coaching on the sat is. Pdf quasiexperimentelle wirkungsevaluation mit propensity. You can also run postestimation regression with the functions. Propensity score matching stata program and output. Guidance, stata code, and empirical examples are given to illustrate 1 the process. Some parts of the notes are taken from various sources listed below and no originality is claimed. Why propensity scores should not be used for matching gary kingy richard nielsenz november 10, 2018 abstract we show that propensity score matching psm, an enormously popular method of preprocessing data for causal inference, often accomplishes the opposite of its intended goal thus increasing imbalance, inef.

We addressed this issue by using a propensity score matching procedure that enabled us. Using linear regression and propensity score matching. Propensity scorematching methods, as we demonstrate, are especially useful under such circumstances because they provide a natural weighting scheme that yields unbiased estimates of the treatment impact. Propensity scores for the estimation of average treatment. However, stata introduced a new teffects command for. With this case study in hand, you will feel confident that you have the tools necessary to begin answering some of your own research questions using propensity scores. Sekhon uc berkeley abstract matching is an r package which provides functions for multivariate and propensity score matching and for nding optimal covariate balance based on a genetic search algorithm. Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Propensity score matching with xtreg regressions statalist. The key contribution of this paper is to discuss and apply propensity scorematching methods, which are new to the economics literature.

Propensity score methods are not a panacea for the selfselection problem. Tips for clinical researchers lecture series that is sponsored by the irving. Spanish stata meeting 2018 outline brief intro to propensity score matching psm for estimation of causal effects in observational studies psm with clustered multilevel, hierarchical data psm in stata available routines how to implement psm with clustered data dofile and dataset to replicate the analyses in these slides can be. This number of blocks ensures that the mean propensity score is not different for treated and controls in each blocks step 2. Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference1 daniel e. Whether and if true how to incorporate multilevel structure into the modeling for propensity score. An intuitive introduction to propensity score matching youtube.

Matching now we will match patients in each treatment on propensity score using the psmatch2 command in stata. Propensity score matching basic mechanics of matching the matching criterion could be as simple as the absolute difference in the propensity score for treated vs. Multivariate and propensity score matching software with. Propensity score matching allows one to estimate the att imbens, 2004. The articles appearing in the stata journal may be copied or reproduced as printed copies, in whole or in part, as long as any copy or reproduction includes attribution to both 1 the author and 2 the stata journal. Statistics treatment effects matching estimators propensityscore matching. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity. Matching in stata psmatch2 package created by edwin leuven and barbara sianesi. We use logistic regression to calculate the propensity scores. Bin the sample into quintiles or finer by propensity score. We will specify the common support option so that it.

The psmatch procedure optionally creates strata of observations that have similar propensity scores. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing. Propensity score matching regression discontinuity limited. Propensity score matching is a common technique used to estimate the effects of a treatment or program when you dont have a randomized controlled experiment. The most commonly used platform for these tools is stata and we will present the. Stepbystep guidelines for propensity score weighting. A practical guide to getting started with propensity scores.

Propensity score matching psm uses a vector of observed variables to predict the probability of experiencing the event participation to create a counterfactual group pt. For more information about propensity score weighting, see the section propensity score weighting on page 7707. Using the propensity score the authors 2012 method to. Matching most popular propensity score based method we match subjects from the treatment groups by ex subjects who are unable to be matched are discarded from the analysis a. However, when the sampling design oversamples treated units, it has been found that matching on the log odds of the propensity score p1 p is a superior criterion. Rosenbaum and rubin 1983, the matching is often conducted based on the probability of being assigned into the intervention, which is called the propensity score. Test of balancing property of the propensity score use option detail if you want more detailed output variable w3firstsex is not balanced in block 1. We will specify the logit option, otherwise it would use probit which is the default. We will specify the common support option so that it will leave out cases that lie outside the range of. Psm does not need bias correction, because psm matches on a single continuous covariate. The most common implementation of propensity score matching is onetoone or pair matching, in which pairs of treated and untreated subjects are formed, such that matched subjects have similar values of the propensity score. End of the estimation with the nearest neighbor matching random draw method. Propensity score matching propensity score estimation 6 matching strategy and att estimation propensity score matching with stata nearest neighbor matching example. Favored not for the overall estimate as much as the substantive value.

Propensity score matching and related models examples in stata greedy matching and subsequent analysis of hazard rates optimal matching postfull matching analysis using the hodgeslehmann aligned rank test postpair matching analysis using regression. Propensity score matching is used when a group of subjects receive a treatment and wed like to compare their outcomes with the outcomes of a control group. Apr 06, 2018 stata has a function for tseffects for obtaining propensity scores, and the function of psmatch for propensity score matching. For r fans, here is a nice tutorial on propensity score matching.

Using linear regression and propensity score matching to estimate the effect of coaching on the sat ben domingue derek c. Matching cases on propensity score will approximately balance treated and untreated. However, stata introduced a new teffects command for estimating treatments effects in a variety of ways, including propensity score matching. Propensity score matching in observational studies propensity scores are an alternative method to estimate the effect of receiving treatment when random assignment of treatments to subjects is not feasible. The key contribution of this paper is to discuss and apply propensity score matching methods, which are new to the economics literature. This type of matching is known as propensityscore matching psm. Psm attempts to reduce the bias due to confounding variables that could. Propensity models depend on the potential outcomes model popularized by don rubin1. Stepbystep guidelines for propensity score weighting with. Pdf programme evaluation using difference in difference.

Propensity scores for the estimation of average treatment effects in. Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. We addressed this issue by using a propensityscore matching procedure that enabled us to match early and late. Lecture notes on propensity score matching jinlung lin this lecture note is intended solely for teaching. A comparison of outcomes is made between treated and control groups. The stata twang commands were developed to support the use of the twang tools without requiring analysts to learn r. Propensity score matching, differenceindifferences models, treatment evaluation in stata. Pr t 1 s e ts can estimate the effect of an event on those who do and do not experience it in the observational data through matching. The stata commands to do this are logistic t x1 x2 x3. Probability of assignment to a 10% relative to a 5% rate increase. Brief intro to propensity score matching psm for estimation of causal effects in observational studies. Propensity score estimation is a pure prediction problem. Apr 30, 2014 to model the steps involved in preparing for and carrying out propensity score analyses by providing stepbystep guidance and stata code applied to an empirical dataset.

11 282 668 370 359 492 77 141 365 1468 350 439 138 567 14 1462 4 716 1411 959 962 1269 359 1411 702 887 1221 761 448 96 112 1453 327 50 1180 472 965 1114 262 744 256 1264 441 696 687 237 1187 941 496